A Few Thoughts on The Palm Pre

Palm Pre Thomas R. Hall tinkered with a Palm Pre this weekend and sent me a few of his preliminary thoughts on it. I thought his email was so interesting that it should be shared, and he graciously agreed to letting me reprint it below.

While these are just Thomas’ thoughts expressed to me, he is such a clear and logical person that I didn’t have to clean up the wording at all: it’s very readable, and I think you’ll find it interesting. For me it was also timely, because I’m on the verge of getting a new phone, and I am leaning strongly toward a new iPhone (even more so after Thomas’ email).

Here are Thomas’ impressions:

I played with the Pre this weekend at a Sprint store. It’s… okay. Not bad at all for a first device, and the multitasking is awesome. But even without running a ton of apps simultaneously (I closed them when I wasn’t using them and often had nothing open, just the phone in standby), the battery went quickly! Like 1.5 faster than the original iPhone 2.0 release quickly. I doubt it would make it through the day, even with only moderate use. This may get better with OS updates (as it did on the iPhone 2.x series), so we’ll see. The Pre gets WARM quickly. This is a problem with power-hungry CDMA phones, so a GSM model may fare better. Time will tell.

The UI isn’t consistent. I think you would find some things that would bug you. Tap targets are small and with a small screen, I don’t see it being good for anyone with big fingers or older eyes. It’s like they were having an identity crisis with the UI. Are we a keyboard-based UI or touch-based? An example is that you have to use the keyboard for copy/paste but touch to access menus. So you move from the physical keyboard up a long way to the top of the screen when the keyboard is extended. It’s hard to describe, but it feels inconsistent. I think a lot of folks who like it like the new, shininess of the UI and aren’t noticing this. But I think it would fatigue the user subconsciously. The Android OS doesn’t suffer from this. It marries keyboard with touch well.

Lack of apps will hurt Palm in the near term, but I’m sure that will get better over time. Multitasking, Synergy, and notifications shine on the device, but those are mainly UI elements. Notifications are great on Android as well, and something similar to switch apps could work on it. Synergy is also something that others could introduce.

I think the real allure for some is the physical keyboard. I don’t see Apple going that route, so Palm and Android devices (and BlackBerry) have that going for them for part of the market. Also, while the calendar, mail, and contact apps are well thought out and usable, tasks and memos are terrible. With tasks you can have different lists and show all lists or one and then all, completed, or remaining tasks. No priority or date sorting, etc. And memos are just notes on a corkboard. Pathetic. Not usable for productivity purposes for now.

I think the OS is a great 1.0, the hardware is beta at best (they could have made it slightly bigger to get a bigger keyboard and batter in there), but I hope it keeps Palm going, as I can see this becoming better in the future. And competition is good for consumers, as Apple, Google, and Palm all have to keep raising the bar.

I have other thoughts, but I’ll stop my rambling for now. I think for me, I see an Android-based device in the BB Curve 8900 form factor, but with a touch screen being my main device for productivity and general browsing, etc. I still see the iPhone or iPod Touch as a media consumption device as well as for running other apps (not my main productivity ones I need on hand all the time), unless Apple opens up their APIs to allow for a richer calendar/contact/PIM experience.


 

This entry was posted in Gadgets and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Thomas R. Hall

    Thanks, Bruce. I wanted to chime in with a few of the other comments I have seen by Matt Miller that seem to agree with my findings. I think his article is VERY level-headed and those that say things like “this is the best phone ever” or “this is the best browser ever” are a bit off. I think they are suffering a bit from the “new car smell”.

    A few interesting quotes from Matt Miller’s post today are similar to my thoughts and experiences:

    : There is a lot of jumping back and forth between the display
    : and keyboard and I really wish the Pre had support for
    : shortcuts like the fantastic G1/Google Android support.

    and

    : It is taking me a bit of time to get used to the gesture
    : area and I keep on looking for a back button or other hardware
    : button to navigate. Like the iPhone you touch the display or
    : press the center single button to navigate all around the Pre.

    Again, I think it’s a great device for Palm’s return back with a brand-new OS. I just don’t think it’s _right_ for everyone just yet. It will definitely meet some people’s needs, though.

    • http://www.keenerliving.com/ Bruce Keener

      Fantastic additional points, Thomas. Thanks for adding them, and thank you very much for sharing your insights on the Pre. Sounds like something I would like to tinker with, but it does sound like the iPhone is more for me.

  • H Cooper

    I have the iPhone 3G which I use as a PDA and to me it is the best I’ve used. I’ve had a palm PDA, 2 Windows PDAs, a BB Curve, HTC Touch HD and a Nokia E71 over the years and the iPhone is the only one I’ve ever actually used to keep me organised. My productivity has soared since I got it. I think there are some fantastic productivity apps available-Bento is great, and Pocket Informant and Omnifocus have great features, to name just a few. When the Pre was announced I thought it might be more useful as a PDA out of the box, but now it looks like it has very little in that regard.

    • http://www.keenerliving.com/ Bruce Keener

      H Cooper,
      Thanks for the input on the usefulness of your iPhone as a PDA.

      I should note that early reviews of the iPhone were pretty bleak, as regards battery life, lack of copy/paste, lack of keyboard, and so on … so I think Thomas’ emphasis that this is a 1.0 device is really important to keep in mind. Also, I am seeing some other reviews show up on the web which say that the Pre is an iPhone Killer. So, clearly there are varied opinions on this (naturally). I do thank Thomas again for sharing his thoughts, though.

      • H Cooper

        You make a very good point about the pre being a 1.0 device, yet I can’t help feeling it is still something of a letdown. When the iPhone was first released, I consider it brought a new paradigm in mobile devices. True, touch screens were not new, but so much was fresh and innovative.

        Since then, a multitude of clones has entered the market, but despite being hailed as ‘iPhone killers’ (Why try to kill such a great device?), none has brought in any major advances.

        With it’s multitasking capabilities the pre is bringing something genuinely new and interesting to the market, giving it the opportunity to lure customers previously out of range. But with the iPhone in its current iteration being around for a year now, I really don’t see why Palm couldn’t put more features in the pre to make it a closer competitor. After all, these things are becoming standard requirements. If Palm had put in better productivity apps, a full office suite, expandable memory, and opened an app store more mature and better populated it would have had genuine advantages over the iPhone, and I would have been satisfied, but with the announcement of the iPhone 3GS today removing many of the advantages of the pre, I really think Palm has missed a trick.

  • Pingback: Upgrading from iPhone 3G to iPhone 3GS | Adam Arnold - The Smarter CEO