A Caution on Over-Highlighting

In writing memos, reports, presentations, and even online content, we sometimes want to highlight some points so they are not overlooked. Doing this properly can be a good practice. However, it can also be overdone, so that it has an opposite effect from the intended one.

For example, I learned yesterday that big, bold, red lettering on a web page is typically overlooked by readers. We have learned to associate such lettering with advertisements and even with gimmickry. I learned this from one of Jakob Neilsen’s eye-tracking studies: Fancy Formatting, Fancy Words = Looks Like a Promotion = Ignored.

Learning this caused me to make several changes to my site design. For example, my design had highlighted links to my free ebook and guitar music downloads, as follows:

Looks Like Ads

Since it seemed to me that people might be viewing these as advertisements or gimmickry, I did away with the highlighting and now just have simple links to them. I also did away completely with the use of red links. Perhaps this is a bit of an over-reaction, but I certainly do not want people to think of my site as gimmickry, so the changes seemed necessary to me. (There’s probably nothing inherently wrong with red links … I just didn’t want to take any chances and wanted to go with a more conservative-looking site.)

So, what relevance does this have for you?

One example might be this: Perhaps you are writing a proposal to the senior management team and want to include some quotes from Einstein or another “thinker” that would support your points. That might be a good thing to do, or it might not be, depending in part on the length of the quote. I know that I tend to skim over long quotes, sometimes skipping them entirely. Maybe not everyone does this, but I think I’m pretty typical in that regard.

Similarly, if you bold a sentence in a paragraph, you’ll get my attention with it, but if you bold the whole paragraph, I’ll skim right over it (as may other readers).

You can probably think of other examples. I only wanted to make you aware that over-highlighting can lead to your key results being overlooked.


 

This entry was posted in Insights and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Alex

    To me, your former “red on white” design looked great, both fresh and comfortable, except for those strange avatars in comments (but these are so ididotic on purpose to encourage people to change them with their photos a.s.a.p, right?)

    I have some experience with interface design from that programming hobby I once had. K.I.S.S. principle is one of the best design axiomas, and a good start. Blue on white is considered probably the best design for eye comfort (talking about research on physiology of human vision made by MS and Co). But a web designer should also concern psychological meaning of colors (like in Lusher color test), and an overall style. Then, the rule of 7 elements limit within one field of view also works fine because of neuropsychological features of a human brain. Etc, etc. I bet You already know the craft, Bruce, as Your site was always been wonderfully harmonic and functional. Still, just to entertain You a bit, I’d like to provide some counterproductive examples from an expert’s vault. Here is my favorite site on the topic:

    http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/10-worst-web-pages-featured-on-web-pages-that-suck-in-2006.html

    Have fun, and hopefully harvest some benefit!

  • Alex

    Sorry for misspelling “Luscher”, I guess he’s swiss after all. And my personal favorite on webpagesthatsuck.com is an “Accept Jesus, Forever Forgiven” which is #4 on 2006′ top ten. This is how you design a site under a tremendous dose of psylocybin or something, and do not miss the sound, too. Then You would probably relax about Your own site.
    :)

  • http://www.keenerliving.com/ Bruce Keener

    Thank you, Alex, for the kind words about my site’s design and thank you for the information. I appreciate you letting me know that the red links looked fine to you. I probably over-reacted in totally eliminating the red color from the site, but I simply did not want to risk appearing gimmicky to anyone.

    I looked at the worstsites link, and they sure are the worst. I agree with you about the “Accept Jesus, Forever Forgiven” site design being the absolute worst. It is a splendid example of how someone can destroy their message, and wind up having the opposite of their intended impact. Sad.

  • Thomas R. Hall

    I _love_ your new site design. VERY clean and easy to read. Glad that you are always focusing on improving the user experience.

  • http://www.keenerliving.com/ Bruce Keener

    Thank you very much, Thomas!