My Backup Tools

August 8, 2007

My two primary backup tools are Chronsync for my iMac and Smartsync Pro for my Windows devices. I’ve only recently began using Chronosync, but I am impressed with its speed and ease of configuration. I’ve used Syncpro for years, being prompted to do so by Walt Mossberg’s endorsement of it in one of his older articles. Both my Chronosync and Syncpro backups are to an external Firelite hard drive.

I’d love to hear from you on what you use for backup.

I also recently began using Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) for selected backups. For example, I use it to backup my blog to Amazon’s secure servers (in addition to backing it up to my Firelite drive).

Amazon S3 appears to be intended for developers, but as far as I can tell anyone can use it. I like the fact that it gives me secure offsite data storage: I have used Amazon for many years and am confident in their data security. I also like the fact that S3 is very cheap.

Setting up an S3 account was easy. Learning how to use it took a bit of effort. My starting point was some of super-geek Paul Stamatiou’s material, starting with his how-to on being a website performance junkie.

Doing a little digging from there led me to download Cockpit, which let me connect to S3 using my two secure, encrypted access keys. Once connected, I used Cockpit to set up a few “buckets” in my S3 account. These are somewhat analogous to folders, but they are global, and each one has a separate access control, defaulting to accessible only to the owner of the bucket.

One of the advantages to using Cockpit, available for Mac (or ‘Nix) or Windows, is that it lets you assign sensible names to the buckets. Some other tools that connect to S3 use the S3 default naming conventions, which assigns unique alphanumeric keys as the names. With Cockpit, you can assign a name that makes sense to you.

Once I had set up a bucket for backing up my blog, I downloaded my blog to my iMac’s hard drive and then uploaded from there to the S3 using Cockpit:

Uploading to S3

The cost for uploading these 86 MegaBytes? A few pennies:

S3 upload cost

(Note that my blog has 86 MB because of all of the music uploads I have done. Otherwise, it would be less than 5 MB.)

In addition to using Cockpit, I am learning to use the Amazon S3 Firefox Extension, which is just an extension for the Firefox browser that will let you connect to Amazon S3 and manage your files (uploading and so forth). In some respects, Cockpit is easier to use, although it has the downside that I have to run it within a Terminal on my iMac. I use Terminal to switch to the directory where the Cockpit.sh script is located and run “sudo bash cockpit.sh”. Windows users have an easier time of it, and only need to double-click the bat file.

I doubt right now that I will use S3 for a full system backup of either my Mac or Windows systems. Primary reason: upload time. Uploading several gigabytes of data would be very time consuming. The cost would be fine, but the time involved would be more than I would want to bother with. (Of course, if I cleaned all the crap off of my hard drives, there would be less to back up: I probably have at least a gigabyte of application downloads that I could store on a DVD: text editors, sync tools, and other utilities.)

However, I do think it is a good idea to use S3 (or similar services) to backup really critical data. Not only does it give you an offsite backup, in case of catastrophe, but it gets you accustomed to having data “in the cloud,” so to speak. I suspect that, in time, we will all be living with data in the cloud (and applications, too). That is probably a topic all by itself, and I will give some thought to writing about it later.

I am also using S3 to supply some images for this site. More on that on another day.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1

jackie 08.09.07 at 12:05 am

I am checking out all the backup services i can….from my first impression it seems they are all more or less the same.. i dont like the free guys…i remember the 90’s not to long ago and all the free web stuff went bust.. and i dont need them to go bust with my data… I recently began playing with a online backup company called http://www.onlinebackupvauly.com i like their page, but mainly what i like about this internet backup site is their tech support… Many of the companies do not offer phone support and those that do are using Indians….Online Backup Vault .com is uses only americans which is important to me…
what do u guys think

2

Bruce 08.09.07 at 7:30 am

Thanks for mentioning onlinebackupvault, Jackie. I haven’t tried but it is good to know that they have good customer service. That is obviously very important. It does not matter much to me, personally, who a company outsources its tech support to, as data security is the greatest concern for me.

3

John 08.09.07 at 8:06 am

I just backup some data files at the moment, Quicken and 1 or 2 others, using Google email.

I intend to buy Windows Home Server when it becomes available (Fall??) for real backup that will include digital photos, etc.

4

Bruce 08.09.07 at 8:17 am

A couple of interesting backup methods, John: Google Mail and a home server solution.

I used Gmail once for sharing one file amongst a few devices, but had not thought of it in terms of its ability to store a few critical files for me.

I’ll have to look into Windows Home Server. Haven’t been paying much attention to it, but sounds like something I might be interested in.

5

frank itadin 08.14.07 at 7:55 pm

i just tested http://www.onlinebackupvault.com
i also have used carbonite.
onlinebackupvault.com is a much better solution for backing up a buisness or when u have exchane,sql or when you need to hold multiple versions of a software package. mozy,carbonite and other cheapies are good for throwing files..

6

Bruce 08.14.07 at 8:08 pm

Thanks for the link, Frank. I’ll probably stick with S3 a while longer, but I sure like knowing about other options.

Leave a Comment